Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Balzac, Courbet and Joyce, Cezanne.

Balzac, dressing-gowned, moustache penner,
championed what I know not.
Whatever it was, it still is.
It was the same with Courbet.
Painter to the ordinary - no ordinary painter.
On a level footing the two find themselves.
They may not have found themselves.
They found themselves.
Only Art and Drama.
It can have been no other way.
No matter how you weigh,
it was a little curse and a blessing.
Joyce, James of course, stands
In trousers - no gown thanks.
Opposite Balzac his work sits.
Not what the words depict
But the words themselves.

Like Cezanne, it's not so much what
But how.
Like Balzac and Joyce,
So too Courbet and Cezanne.
It's a real boar - reality.
An absolute pig of a thing.
Hunting I love but love? I laugh to score.
It's not for everyone...
To care for things long since gone.
Necromance novellist.
Can't you see that you will be one day?
Gone like your wind.
I don't care that you don't care.
Before I turn to serious,
I'll leave in a cloud
Of my own ommissions.
Balzac and Joyce: opposite.
Balzac and Courbet: equal.
Courbet and Cezanne: opposite.
Cezanne and Joyce: equal.
62
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
3 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]
1. December 1st 2007 @ 19:11. D. Armenta Says:
If Balzac was always gowned rather than trousered, it must have played hell with his ball sac. I just can't support the thought.

On the other hand, being gowned is infinitely preferable to being pantsed, which would be a blatant case of overexposure.

Unless, of course, it were a windy day; then I imagine that being gowned or pantsed would fall into the "equal" category.

What are your thoughts on this?

(Hi Norm! It's good to read you again!)

D.
2. December 1st 2007 @ 23:20. Norm Says:
How he was able to work they way that he say he did must be attributed to the ease of access with which the gown affords a person.

You will of course note the very famous photo of Joyce with his hands in his pockets. Yet another means of getting to the source of his own creativity.

On being pantsed, I can only offer you this: you'd better hope one was wearing undergarmentry. Of which, sadly, history has little to say.

Cheers.

3. December 3rd 2007 @ 16:26. D. Armenta Says:
You will of course note the very famous photo of Joyce with his hands in his pockets. Yet another means of getting to the source of his own creativity
.
Hahahahaha!!!!
Bless your wit, Norm. If you and Damo weren't here, I'd have gone when David left.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
5 Posts
781 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Norm's Blogs

6835 Vote(s)
327 Comment(s)
75 Post(s)
46193 Vote(s)
2566 Comment(s)
679 Post(s)
24534 Vote(s)
338 Comment(s)
376 Post(s)
Moderated by Norm
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]